Company Residence & Tax Ruling 2018/5
High Court Tax Case
As the result of a recent High Court case and an Australian Taxation Office (ATO) ruling, private groups located in Australia and investing offshore need to review their governance and control arrangements for overseas companies – who owns your tax dollar?
Australian company tax rules apply to a company that is incorporated in Australia, which is fairly obvious.
What is less obvious, and has been the cause of some confusion, is the tax treatment of foreign companies that carry out business overseas, but have their central management and control (‘CMC’) located in Australia. Having a CMC located in Australia may mean that your foreign companies could be taxed in Australia.
CMC is the control and direction of a company’s operations. It is the strategic and high level direction of the company, for example policies and operations, and will usually be exercised by its directors, but not always. It is not the day to day management of the company’s activities which is usually undertaken by managers under the control of policies set by the directors.
How should this should be interpreted? What does central management and control (“CMC”) mean and if this is exercised in Australia does it make an overseas company tax resident?
Since 2004 the ATO have applied the CMC test in a pragmatic way, which broadly meant that offshore trading companies would not be regarded as tax resident if they had substantial operations and some form of governance structure overseas. The prior approach was that overseas trading companies with an offshore director or two were unlikely to be treated as Australian tax resident, even if there were Australian resident directors on the Board.
For overseas investment companies the situation was less clear, and the ATO would look at where the investment decisions were made to establish tax residence.
The recent case of Bywater Investments Ltd, and the ATO’s reinterpretation of the law in the light of this case in Tax Ruling 2018/5, creates some significant changes that impact the way offshore companies owned by Australian groups need to be governed.
If an overseas company has CMC exercised in Australia the ATO may now treat it as tax resident here even if it is also tax resident overseas.
There are a number of tax consequences that may arise following this change in interpretation including:
- the overseas company may need to lodge tax returns in Australia;
- its profits may therefore be subject to tax in both Australia and the overseas jurisdiction;
- capital gains tax consequences can arise on disposal of the overseas company;
- overseas trading businesses versus investment businesses may now have different tax outcomes.
Where your overseas companies have Australian resident directors you need to review your governance arrangements urgently. Even if there are no Australian resident directors you will need to review how you govern your overseas companies and consider the feasibility of not having CMC in Australia. This must be weighed against any particular risk where influential individuals live here and take an active role in what happens in the overseas companies.
The ruling applies from 15 March 2017 but the ATO have given companies affected by this until 30 June 2019 (extended from 13 December 2018) to change
governance arrangements to meet the new interpretation of the law on CMC and tax residence.
Bentleys has extensive experience of advising private groups on management and governance operations both nationally and
internationally. Please contact your Bentleys tax adviser to discuss your next steps.
Please contact your Bentleys tax adviser to discuss your next steps.
P 02 9220 0733